Poker Games

July 22nd, , 1: Only pot limit games allow the dealer, on request, to inform the players of the pot size and the amount of a pot raise before it's made. Likewise, any other cards that would normally be dealt face down, such as the final card in seven-card stud , may be dealt face-up. While the video game community is caught up in fierce debate over whether or not loot boxes constitute gambling, the UK Gambling Commission has released a report that suggests many children are being introduced to a less ambiguous form of betting through gaming at a young age. If you have a kid that wants to learn, so ahead and teach them!! Poker with money or chips

Navigation menu

Get an account and

August 2nd, , 7: Seriously guys, it could be very very controversial Some of you mentioned something like imroving social skills, something like brain trening and i would dissagree right away.

Simply because of poker's "side affects". Whether some of you wants to admit it or not, poker is a strongly addictive game, not significly less than any other gambling game and it could easily go wrong, from fun and amusement to a person with a gambling problems. I just want to say that some people are prone to addiction much more that other people, whether because of their genetic dispositions, whether because of their psychological structure So if your kid is prone to this kind of addictions, you are doing it all wrong sir.

I don't want to sound cruelly and to be missunderstood but we are talking about kids here, to me, "Should we teach poker to our kids? Thank you for bringing up this question. Drinking alcohol is way different then teaching kids poker.. The two aren't even comparable - You can become addicted to anything watching TV, Playing video games, or what ever Besides teaching your kid poker and teaching them gambling are two different things Actually when I was a kid we would play Yu-Gi-Oh A card game based on a Japanese TV Show and we would "play for keeps" which meant whoever won got to keep another players yu-gi-oh card There seems to be a lot of parallels with poker and real life and lots more to learn from the game like maths, behaviour, psychology etc.

August 2nd, , 8: They will think it's normal to play the game and the amount of lives this will ruin is off the scale. Should we teach them all to be pro athletes as well? What are we all missing here? Really are we winning most here can't say they are making a living and if you play for fun part time I respect that. Poker doesn't offer that. Your much more likely to waste hours and hours of your life breaking even. To many kids get obsessed watch it on tv and get this idea into their heads that they will be pro.

August 4th, , 1: To me, poker can be just another game. If you have a kid that wants to learn, so ahead and teach them!! If you're just trying to force it on them because it's what you love, leave the kid alone.

Maybe that early learning experience will let them be the next Phil Ivey, but that decision is ultimately up to the kid and the adult they will eventually become. Originally Posted by cotta August 4th, , 2: Yea I am all for it, I wish someone had taught me poker from an early age, my luck was immense when I was a kid, I was always winning on the fruit machines We played a lot of card games for money with my aunties, only coppers like but it was fun.

I would of raked it in playing poker as a kid. Sigh, now I am missing my aunties. August 4th, , 7: If I were parents, I would teach child some outdoor activity first, unless weather is hot. Compare poker to video games, think would more like to teach them poker. August 7th, , 2: Originally Posted by zayzoo. August 7th, , 7: Honestly wouldn't want to bring my kids up as gamblers, so not sure I would introduce them to poker until they got a little older. I know some people will say that poker can still be fun without money, and of course it can be, but we all know it's not the same game when no stakes are on the line, even if only a little bit.

August 7th, , 8: Imo, it's ok to include kids in a family poker game, but I wouldn't suggest playing headsup4rollz with them. I think it can help to demystify things like alcohol to children, and I see no problem with introducing them to a sip of wine at a dinner for example.

Perhaps it was introduced during the large, well publicised tournaments in the 's, which are largely responsible for the current popularity of poker. This rule is now standard for formal poker and on-line poker, and has been introduced into some private games.

Nevertheless, many private poker games are played without this minimum for raises. Any raise can be any amount from the minimum bet for the round up to the maximum, even if the previous bet was larger. In such a game, if the number of raises is limited, a player may legitimately make a minimum raise of a larger bet in order to consume one of the allowed raises and thereby restrict the potential size of the pot.

A bet that is at least the minimum is sometimes known as a full bet , and a raise that is as least as large as the largest bet or raise in the current betting round, and not less than a full bet is known as a full raise. Bets and raises that are smaller than this are known as incomplete bets or raises.

When playing with table stakes, if one does not have enough chips for a full bet or raise, it is legal to go "all-in", putting all one's chips in the pot for an incomplete bet or raise - see the table stakes section for details. A few games - especially fixed and spread limit games, and some low stakes private games - have a rule against the " check-raise ".

With this rule in effect, if you call or check or pass during a betting round and some other player after you bets or raises, when the turn comes around to you again you are not allowed to raise: To raise in such a situation is sometimes known as sandbagging. You have a good hand, but instead of betting you lie in wait, pretending to have indifferent cards, and when a player bets against you, you launch your ambush by raising back.

In some circles this tactic is considered unfair or at least unfriendly and is therefore outlawed. Note however that even with this rule in effect, checking in one betting round does not prevent you from betting or raising in a later betting round, by which time your hand might have improved. In most formal games and nearly all games without a fixed maximum bet pot limit and no limit games the check-raise is permitted and is considered a valid and useful tactic.

Every poker game begins with some kind of compulsory payment to the pot. Without this, the players would have no incentive to bet. If you were to bet chips into an empty pot you would stand to lose them if another player with a good hand bet against you, but if all your opponents had indifferent hands and dropped out you would get back only the same chips that you put in, gaining nothing.

If the pot contains some chips to begin with, it is worthwhile for players with moderately good hands to bet in order to win those chips. The most straightforward way to start the pot is for every player to pay an equal, fixed ante before the deal.

A practical problem with this is that quite often someone may forget to pay the ante, and when the shortage of chips in the pot is noticed, it can be difficult to establish who is at fault. A solution is to have the dealer pay a single, larger ante on behalf of all the players. This is fair provided that everyone deals the same number of times during a session. Note that the ante does not count as a bet: In the first betting round players can simply check to stay in.

In some games, one or more players are forced to make a blind bet before the cards are dealt. Normally the player s placing blinds will be immediately to the left of the dealer seat, sometimes including the dealer as well. If the blinds are unequal in size they will increase to the left, the leftmost player placing the largest blind. The largest blind should be equal to the minimum bet for the game.

Blinds do count as bets, so players who wish to stay in must at least call the biggest blind. The first betting round starts with the player to the left of the big blind, who may call, raise or fold.

The big blind player acts last, and may raise even if no one else has done any more than call. Alternatively, if no one else has raised, the big blind player may simply check to stay in, since the active players' bets are already equal. In games with blinds, the player to the left of the big blind may be allowed to straddle , which is to place a voluntary blind bet twice the size of the big blind before the cards are dealt.

In some games, if a player straddles, the next player to the left is allowed to re-straddle , placing a blind bet of twice as much again. The first betting round will begin to the left of the player who placed the largest straddle. Normally a straddle also raises the betting limits proportionately: The purpose of straddling is to gain the advantage of acting last in the first betting round. However, this advantage is probably not worth as much as the cost of placing a blind bet which will be wasted if one's cards are poor.

In stud poker, the pot is normally started by a compulsory bet known as the bring-in. There may or may not be an ante as well. Unlike a blind bet, the bring-in is placed after the first part of the deal, and is based on a player's hand - in a stud game the player who must bet is determined by the up-card. Some games are played with a kill. This is a blind bet normally twice the size of the minimum bet, which must be placed by a certain player the killer in particular circumstances - for example after a big win or winning twice in a row.

If the killer would otherwise have been due to place a blind, the kill replaces the blind. As with a straddle, the minimum and maximum bets are increased in proportion if there is a kill.

The first betting round may begin either to the left of the kill or to the left of the big blind according to local rules. Either way, players who wish to stay in must at least call the kill bet.

The killer can raise at his or her first turn. All formal poker games and tournaments in casinos and public card rooms and many private games are played for table stakes.

This means that you can only bet using the chips that you have in front of you at the start of the deal. This rule is to prevent a player from suddenly betting a large sum which the other players were unaware of at the start of the deal and which they cannot afford to call.

When playing for table stakes:. Normally there is a minimum value of chips that must be bought in order to join a game. This is fixed by the host, and is typically around 10 to 20 times the minimum bet. Some games without a fixed maximum bet may have a maximum buy-in.

In this case you are not allowed to buy chips that take you above the maximum. You can however exceed the maximum by virtue of chips won from other players, and while in this situation you cannot buy any more chips.

Table stakes rules are important in games without a fixed maximum bet, in which players may easily run out of chips as the pot size escalates. In fixed limit and spread limit games table stakes are not so important, especially if the limits are low. Players do not often run out of chips and if they do it does little harm to let them buy more any time they are needed, even during the betting if necessary, since the amount that can be bet is restricted by the fixed maximum.

When playing with table stakes you may reach a situation where you do not have enough chips for the action you wish to take. In this case you put all your remaining chips in the pot and you are said to be all-in , or tapped out. There are three cases to consider:. If E calls or folds, A has the same options. If either E or A completes the bet, B and C have the full range of options, to call, fold or raise. If both E and A call or fold, neither B nor C can raise: If player E calls or folds, player A has the same options: B cannot raise because there has been no full raise since B's previous bet.

For the same reason, player C can only call or fold. However, if player E or player A had raised, this would have reopened the betting, and players B and C would also be entitled to raise. Each time a player goes all-in and another player bets more than the all-in player, a new side pot is created.

So if more than one player goes all-in in the same deal, there can be several side pots. Each player who is all-in is in contention for the main pot and all side pots in which that player has chips. When a new player goes all-in, the current side pot is capped and a new side pot is created. The capped side pot holds equal numbers of chips from each active player apart from those who were already all-in before the side pot was created.

A second side pot is now needed. The other players fold. A player who folds cannot win any part of any pot. Suppose that at the end of the example above, A decides to fold. The side pots are allocated in reverse order of creation. Player A, who has folded, cannot win the main pot, even though he has contributed the same amount to this pot as B, C and D. When the action is complete, all active players' cards are turned face up.

When there are at least two active players, and all but one of them are all-in, there will be no more betting since the one active player who has chips to bet has no one to bet against. At this point, the normal rule is that all the active players' cards must be revealed, and any further cards are dealt face up even those that would normally be dealt face down.

The same rule naturally applies in the unusual case where there are at least two active players and all of them are all-in. In some versions of poker, the pot is split between two winners - for example the holders of the highest and lowest hands. In some games this is done automatically: In other games players have to declare which part of the pot they are playing for.

In this case there are three possible declarations. In a high-low game you can declare "high" to compete for highest hand, "low" to compete for lowest hand, or "both" also known as "pig" , to win the whole pot if and only if you have both the highest and the lowest hand. Players who fold place their cards face down in a discard pile known as the "muck". By , the estimated number of people who had participated in online gambling rose to 8 million and growth would continue, despite the legislation and the lawsuit challenges which would continue to be received by online gambling.

The Internet has made way for new types of gambling to form online. Improvements in technology have changed betting habits just as video lottery terminals , keno and scratchcards changed the gambling industry in the early 20th century.

Gambling has become one of the most popular and lucrative businesses present on the Internet. This is partly due to the wide range of gambling options that are available to facilitate many different types of people. Jackson and Shane A. Thomas a survey recorded in Australia shows the most common forms of gambling were lotteries Players play against each other rather than the "house", with the card room making its money through " rake " and through tournament fees.

There are a large number of online casinos in which people can play casino games such as roulette , blackjack , pachinko , baccarat and many others. These games are played against the "house" which makes money because the odds are in its favor.

Sports betting is the activity of predicting sports results and placing a wager on the outcome. Usually the wager is in the form of money. Most lotteries are run by governments and are heavily protected from competition due to their ability to generate large taxable cash flows. The first online lotteries were run by private individuals or companies and licensed to operate by small countries. Most private online lotteries have stopped trading as governments have passed new laws giving themselves and their own lotteries greater protection.

Government-controlled lotteries now offer their games online. In its first seventeen years it has created over 2, millionaires. In Camelot decided to rebrand the National Lottery main draw after falling ticket sales. The name National Lottery was kept as the general name for the organisation and the main draw was renamed Lotto.

The new brand and name had the slogan:. Horse racing betting comprises a significant percentage of online gambling wagers and all major Internet bookmakers, betting exchanges, and sports books offer a wide variety of horse racing betting markets. Horse wagering using online methods across state lines is legal in several states in the United States. In , the NTRA and various religious organizations lobbied in support of an act in Congress meant to limit online gambling.

Some critics of the bill argued that the exemption of horse racing wagering was an unfair loophole. In response, the NTRA responded that the exemption was "a recognition of existing federal law", not a new development.

Interstate wagering on horse racing was first made legal under the Interstate Horseracing Act written in Mobile gambling refers to playing games of chance or skill for money by using a remote device such as a tablet computer , smartphone or a mobile phone with a wireless Internet connection.

In-play gambling is a feature on many online sports betting websites that allows the user to bet while the event is in progress. A benefit of live in-play gambling is that there are much more markets. For example, in Association football a user could bet on which player will receive the next Yellow card , or which team will be awarded the next corner kick. Advance-deposit wagering ADW is a form of gambling on the outcome of horse races in which the bettor must fund his or her account before being allowed to place bets.

ADW is often conducted online or by phone. In contrast to ADW, credit shops allow wagers without advance funding; accounts are settled at month-end. Racetrack owners, horse trainers and state governments sometimes receive a share of ADW revenues.

The money for online gambling can come from credit card, electronic check, certified check, money order, wire transfer, or cryptocurrencies. Normally, gamblers upload funds to the online gambling company, make bets or play the games that it offers, and then cash out any winnings. Gamblers can often fund gambling accounts by credit card or debit card , and cash out winnings directly back to the card; most U.

Many of the companies operating out of the island nation of Antigua and Barbuda are publicly traded on various stock exchanges, specifically the London Stock Exchange. Antigua has met British regulatory standards and has been added to the UK's "white list", which allows licensed Antiguan companies to advertise in the UK.

The national government, which licenses Internet gambling entities, made a complaint to the World Trade Organization about the U. The Caribbean country won the preliminary ruling but WTO's appeals body somewhat narrowed that favorable ruling in April However, the appeals panel also ruled that the Wire Act and two other federal statutes prohibiting the provision of gambling services from Antigua to the United States violated the WTO's General Agreement on Trade in Services.

Although the United States convinced the appeals panel that these laws were "necessary" to protect public health and morals, the asserted United States defense on these grounds was ultimately rejected because its laws relating to remote gambling on horse-racing were not applied equally to foreign and domestic online betting companies, and thus the United States could not establish that its laws were non-discriminatory.

Internet gambling restrictions as illegal. The government said that the IGA was important to protect Australians from the harmful effects of gambling. The offense applies to all interactive gambling service providers, whether based in Australia or offshore, whether Australian or foreign owned.

The IGA makes it an offence to provide an interactive gambling service to a customer physically present in Australia, but it is not an offence for Australian residents to play poker or casino games online.

Sports betting online is legal in Australia, with many state government licensed sportsbooks in operation. While the criminal code of Canada does not prohibit online gambling, it does prohibit any type of gambling at an establishment not owned or licensed by a provincial government.

Not withstanding this fact, there are an estimated 1, to 1, offshore websites that make casino type games and other gambling activities available to Canadians. The court found that SCI had sufficient contact with Canada to be prosecuted under its criminal code.

It has since moved its operations overseas. According to John A. Cunningham, Joanne Cordingley, David C. Hodgins and Tony Toneatto a telephone survey was recorded in Ontario that shows there was a strong agreement that conceptions of gambling abuse as a disease or addiction were positively associated with belief that treatment is needed, while there was a strong agreement that disease or wrongdoing were positively associated with the belief that abstinence is required.

On March 5, , France proposed new laws to regulate and tax Internet gambling. Budget minister Eric Woerth stated the French gambling market would expand to adapt to "Internet reality.

The German Interstate Treaty on gaming, which came into force on January 1, , banned all forms of online gaming and betting in the country, with the exception of wagers on horse racing. Schleswig-Holstein is the only German state that has already come up with their own gambling bill allowing gambling online.

From , casino operators can apply for an online gambling license in this state. Online gambling is illegal in the state of Maharashtra under the " Bombay Wager Act ". The most recent law to address gambling online was the Federal Information Technology Rules where such illegal activities may be blocked by Internet providers within India. Another act is the Public Gaming Act of States tend to operate on their own authority.

Online gambling legal issues in India are complicated in nature as Gambling in India is regulated by different states laws and online gambling is a central subject. To ascertain the position of Indian government, the Supreme Court of India sought the opinion of central government [28] in this regard but the same was declined by the central government. On 3 September , Central Board of Direct Taxes CBDT issued a Circular titled "Clarification on Tax Compliance for Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets" under the black money act which directs the online poker players in the country to declare their money transactions on foreign poker sites through the e-wallets and virtual cards.